June 20, 2013

Alexander Thermos, D.O., D.C. joins Dr. Steenblock’s Clinic!

Businessman with BullhornDr. Steenblock is pleased to announce the association of Alexander Thermos, D.O., D.C. with his practice. What does this mean to you as a prospective patient? Quite a lot actually, just consider these highlights from Dr. Thermos’s resume:

D.O. – Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (College of Osteopathic Medicine & Surgery – OSU) – DEAN’S LIST!

D.C. – Doctor of Chiropractic (Palmer College of Chiropractic) - DEAN’S LIST!

Extensive & highly impressive background in:

ACUPUNCTURE

ADDICTIONS:  The treatment of addictions, used in conjunction with Auriculo-Acupuncture and Hyperbaric Oxygen in the treatment of (since 2010)

  • Alcohol Addiction
  • Benzodiazepine Addiction
  • Narcotic Addiction
  • Smoking Addiction

AUTISM: Defeat Autism Now (DAN!)  2008   DAN! Trained and Certified

Bioidentical Hormone Therapy /Natural Hormone Therapy

CANCER: Doing integrative cancer therapy (Holistic treatment of cancer)

Chelation Therapy

CHRONIC  PAIN: The treatment of chronic back pain utilizing Spinal Decompression Therapy, Vibrational Platform, Manipulation, Microcurrent Therapy, AcupunctureHyperbaric Oxygen, Gonstead Technique, Cox Flexion Distraction Technique, Palmer Technique. Trigger Point Injections, Facet Blocks, Sacro-Iliac Injections

Cranial Technique

HBOT: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy 

INTRAVENOUS (IV) TREATMENTS:

Intravenous Orthomolecular Vitamin Infusions

Intravenous Vitamin C Infusions (Dr. Takemoto IPT Protocol since 2002)

Intravenous Infusions for Fibromyalgia, CFS

Intravenous Infusions for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (OBS), Lyme disease, Dry Macular Degeneration, etc.

Intravenous Infusions for Autoimmune Diseases

 Prolotherapy /Neural Therapy

THIS LINK IS TO DR. THERMOS’S RESUME: http://biotheorist.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/alexander-thermos-cv.pdf

Now that you know a little about Dr. Thermos, grab your phone and call 1-800-300-1063 (9 am to 5 pm Pacific Time, Monday through Friday) and set up an appointment to see him!

 

Share

Findings in NIH sponsored study of chelation underscores things Dr. Steenblock discovered long ago!

During November (2012) the results of a lengthy and controversial randomized placebo-controlled NIH-sponsored clinical study on chelation (titled “Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy” or TACT) were shared at the annual meeting of the American Heart Association. The authors of the study reported that when the measures of effectiveness (endpoints written into the study’s design) were combined and number crunched it was found that patients who received chelation had slightly better outcomes (statistically significant) than those who received the sham or placebo treatment. What is compelling is those study participants who had diabetes and received chelation constituted the vast majority of responders.

Interestingly, Dr. Steenblock, who has employed chelation therapy in thousands of patients over the past forty years, long ago determined that people with diabetic peripheral vascular disease enjoyed the greatest improvements in blood flow and other measures of blood vessel health.

When asked about chelation in light of the TACT findings he had this to say:

Early in my career – specifically the first three years I began doing chelation therapy – I studied the lower leg arteries in patients using plethysmography and found that virtually everyone who did the full 30 treatments (something I pioneered as when I started the doctors were only doing 20 treatments) achieved normalization of the leg artery’s blood flow following this (But again, they had to do all 30 treatments). When these patients came in their leg arteries generally had almost flat plethysmography readings, a sign of very poor blood flow since the pulse of blood from every heart contraction was not able to expand the arteries normally so as to give a mild up and down blood flow curve on tests. After 30 treatments everyone had normal full bounding pulses! The results were so positive I quit doing this test since all it did was demonstrate what the patients had already observed – namely, that their feet had warmed up to normal, blood flow was restored, the color went from white to red, their toe hair grew back, intermittent claudication pain had decreased significantly and erectile dysfunction (ED) in men had also frequently improved.

As for the rationale given in the study reported in the November 4 (2012) Forbes article titled “Doctors Dismiss Study That Says Chelation Helps Heart Patients” concerning the mechanism(s) of how Disodium EDTA works, i.e., by removal of heavy metals: This may be a part of the disease remediating process since heavy metals alter the intestinal tract’s immune system making the patient more susceptible to endotoxin poisoning due to gut overproduction of bacteria, yeast, etc., which produce toxins that has been proven to be associated with the atherosclerotic process as well as most if not all chronic degenerative diseases. In short, remove the heavy metals and the gut stops producing as many toxins and thus there is reduced degeneration of the body.

Lead also increases the amount of calcium influx into the cells of the arteries leading to more death and disease of arterial smooth muscle as well as the macrophages of the peripheral arteries which over time will worsen the prognosis of patients with peripheral vascular disease, especially those with diabetes. Since diabetics have more sugar in their blood, they tend to have more endotoxin poisoning as well. They also have more scarring of their arteries than other patients with similar atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. There are many papers on this on PubMed on both these subjects.

In addition, the gradual hypertrophy (enlargement) and output of the parathyroid gland produces a long-term vasodilation of the blood vessels and build up of scar tissue in arteries. One of the reasons chelation works so well in my opinion and works especially well in diabetics is because the disodium version of EDTA degrades this scar tissue that have built up in atherosclerotic arteries.

Readers might be interested to know that urine hydroxyproline is one way in which to gage the breakdown of collagen (scar tissue) and that I proved via my in-office research-oriented clinical work that Disodium EDTA did increase the levels of hydroxyproline in patients who had Disodium EDTA chelation. Unfortunately, no one else doing chelation therapy or scientists doing chelation therapy for arterial disease-related clinical studies have ever formally substantiated my findings or even bothered to ask questions and probe further for that matter. To prove all that I observed requires some very sophisticated, state-of-the-art equipment and lots of money that I never could muster and, as a result, I could not generate the kind of hard science evidence needed to get mainstream medical professionals to believe me. So today more than 30 years later my findings still need to be examined in a vigorous scientific fashion in order to determine better the true mechanisms of how Disodium EDTA helps patients suffering from peripheral vascular disease. But with this said, I can attest to its effectiveness in patients suffering from diabetic peripheral vascular disease on the basis of having treated literally thousands of such patients. Yet it bears repeating that practically no one in the mainstream medical community will believe me until rigorous randomized controlled studies are performed by some agency, group or clinic that can afford it and whose reputation will not be smeared as mine has been each time I raised my head above the proverbial ditch and reported what I was seeing happen in scores of my chelation patients.

 David Steenblock, M.S., D.O.

If you happen to be struggling with coronary artery disease (CAD) or any cardiovascular condition, you can discuss this with Dr. Steenblock for free. To nail down your free consultation just call Dr. Steenblock’s Clinic at 1-800-300-1063 (9 am to 5 pm Pacific Time, Monday through Friday).

 

Share

Beware of Quackwatch

Quackwatch

Learn the Truth About Quackwatch!

Beware of Quackwatch (Includes a critical section-by-section examination of Quackwatch’s “A Skeptical Look at David A. Steenblock, D.O.”)    

Web address: http://bit.ly/KJlSXC

 HARM: A compendium of statistics & information  (Harm done by conventional health care v. AltMed practices & supplements)     

Web address: http://bit.ly/N0O7Aq

Dr. David Steenblock – America’s Stroke & Stem Cell Doctor. No charge consultations: 1-800-300-1063 (9 am to 5 pm Pacific Time, Monday – Friday)

“The Road to Healing Starts Here”

Share

Can Chlorella get toxic lead out of your bones?

chlorellaCan Chlorella get toxic lead out of your bones?

In May 2009 the American Academy of Pediatrics reaffirmed a policy statement titled “Lead Exposure in Children: Prevention, Detection, and Management.”  The abstract from this paper states that “Evidence continues to accrue that commonly encountered blood lead concentrations, even those less than 10 µg/dL, may impair cognition, and there is no threshold yet identified for this effect. Most US children are at sufficient risk that they should have their blood lead concentration measured at least once. There is now evidence-based guidance available for managing children with increased lead exposure.” Click to access the full AAP policy paper. This is good advice for young folks today, but what about older folks? Lead picked up during childhood and later on does, after all, generally wind up sequestered in bones. If you grew up in the era before lead-free gasoline or lived in an area where lead exposure was concentrated then you probably have at least some lead stored in your bones (Where it may adversely impact the stem cells produced and housed in your marrow; stem cells that play an important part in keeping you healthy as well as repairing and restoring damaged, diseased or injured tissues.) Naturally, you probably are probably wondering if there is any way to safely remove this from your body. Well, interestingly scientists have found that the common freshwater algae, Chlorella, does this — at least in animals.  It also stimulated the production of a whole host of body friendly chemical (cytokines” such as ”IFN-γ, IL-1α, TNF-α”  as well as “NK (Natural Killer cells) activity in normal mice.”    Click to access study abstract. This comes as no surprise to Dr. David Steenblock who actually wrote a book on Chlorella back in 1988 titled “Chlorella: Natural Medicinal Algae“, and is also an expert on ways to chelate (removed) heavy metals such as lead using i.v. (intravenous) EDTA and other chemicals.  If after reading this you would like to know more about lead in bones, Chlorella, chelation therapy and Dr. Steenblock’s results-driven form of medical practice you are invited to visit www.strokedoctor.com. You can also call 1-800-300-1063 and speak to his knowledgeable, friendly staff who can provide answer many of your questions and/or set up a phone consultation for you with Dr. Steenblock.

To coin a phrase, “Get the lead out” by visiting Dr. Steenblock’s Clinic web site!

Share

STEM CELL CLINICS- The Good, The Bad and The Ugly!

stem cell clinicsSTEM CELL CLINICS- The Good, The Bad and The Ugly!

Are you sick?  Need help but can’t seem to find it?  If you have a serious chronic disease or injury, your primary concern is to get well as soon as possible.  If a cure is readily available, your licensed physician will prescribe it, your insurance company will pay for it and soon you will be back at work and play! However often the “CURE” is not available or the drugs, surgery or radiation wind up being worse than the disease or condition itself is. Conventional physicians seem to know only about the use of toxic drugs and dangerous surgeries and little if anything about safe, simple, natural remedies that stimulate and augment the bodies’ own healing mechanisms.  Many doctors downplay and even dismiss non-drug treatments that have yet to win FDA approval as well as those they are unacquainted with. “Regular” physicians in general only study and use drugs, surgery and radiation techniques to treat chronic medical problems since that is what they are trained and licensed to do. In fact if they use agents (like vitamins) that are NOT generally considered to be drugs their licensing board can try to take their license away from them since they are no longer following the “standard of care” given by their colleagues. Ask your physician about the use of an herb, vitamin, hyperbaric oxygen, chelation, ozone, magnetic or other safe, natural therapies and you will often be told that you should not use these safer, more natural healing therapies since they “could interfere with your drugs!”  Countless people suffering from one chronic health problem or another have been snookered by their doctors into refusing help from alternative, integrative, complementary, holistic, natural types of health providers and have elected to stay with their conventional orthodox doctors all the way to premature death and the cemetery.

One area of medicine that virtually all physicians know little about is the use of stem cells. Specifically, the use of stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood, bone marrow or fat to treat chronic medical and health problems. Most doctors also appear unaware of the fact that stem cell rich bone marrow and fat tissue can be harvested and given back to patients in their offices, so long as the extracted tissue is not processed beyond what the FDA calls “minimal manipulation.” This means that YOUR STEM CELLS CAN BE USED TO TREAT YOU – right here in the USA!

For those of you reading this who have an intractable or terminal disease that might respond favorably to an infusion of adult stem cells from umbilical cord, placenta, amniotic fluid, bone marrow, fat or other tissues, you basically have three (3) options: (1) find a licensed physician like Dr. Steenblock who will treat you with your own stem cells; (2)Get admitted to an FDA approved clinical study; or (2) Travel to a stem cell clinic in a country that allows the clinical use of pure adult stem cells.

If you can get into a clinical study this is great, provided it is well designed and you actually get the treatment being tested (Keep in mind that some clinical trials are placebo-controlled, randomized and blinded such that participants have no way of assuring he or she will get the actual therapeutic agent.)

However, many stem cell studies being conducted here in the US are flawed, according to knowledgeable critics. Clinical stem cell use expert Dr. David Steenblock has found that many completed clinical studies likely failed to reveal what stem cells can do because the researchers involved  either administered the wrong stem cells to begin with or used a single type of stem cell when a combination of them would have been better, or else put stem cells into people whose bodies were riddled with readily identifiable impediments to stem cell engraftment, proliferation and activity (Things that kept the stem cells from working).

Dr. Steenblock, who has done over 1,000 stem cell rich whole bone marrow treatments since 2006, is perplexed by the fact that the individuals who are designing stem cell clinical studies do not routinely consult doctors who are experienced in their clinical use. This oversight can result in their missing things that should be included in the study or else including things they really shouldn’t. Also, most do not appear to be taking into account things like occult (asymptomatic) infections, dietary practices and patterns, as well as other things that tend to interfere with or impede stem cell engraftment and activity.

This failure to consider asymptomatic infections, as well as dietary and lifestyle practices and such is, in Dr. Steenblock’s opinion, tantamount to letting people who chain smoke or drink alcohol into stem cell studies (Habits that can throw a monkey wrench into the inner works of stem cells or even kill them.) And this would obviously skew the outcome enough as to make a treatment that actually should work into a statistical failure.

For most people living here in America, your first consideration should be using your own stem cells to treat your medical problems.  First of all you will not get any new infectious diseases from the cells since they are your own. Second, Dr. Steenblock has determined new ways of invigorating even an “old” person’s stem cells to work in a much more youthful manner which results in a much better healing response. Third, Dr. Steenblock’s clinic is located in Southern California which is safe, beautiful, has a lovely climate and is fun to travel to. Finally, Dr. Steenblock’s prices are the most reasonable of anyone anywhere!

Even so, you may have no money at all and that is when you should be looking into getting into a clinical trial (You can research approved clinical trials at www.clinicaltrials.gov).  The next option is to try the use of a nutritional supplement that helps your own stem cells work better. You can read about Dr Steenblock’s formula and product StemGevity™ at www.stemgevity.com and you can order this product from his office toll free at 1-800-300-1063. To help you determine what your best course-of-action is please consider calling for a free consultation 1-800-300-1063.

If you can’t get into a stem cell study, this leaves travel to a stem cell clinic in one of the countries that allow the clinical use of pure adult stem cells such as Mexico, China, Thailand, Germany, or Panama.  The first thing to determine is whether you are dealing with a referral service or broker that has a nice web presence.  These people may or may not be ethical but in general have no responsibility to provide you with good care or much else, and are primarily interested in convincing you to fly off to some foreign clinic to get stem cells. They don’t practice medicine nor are they licensed by any organization so they can say and do pretty much whatever they want to. In other words, if you are not happy with the care at the place you are sent to, they don’t have any obligation to refund your money or to help get you out of the trouble that they got you into by their referral.  A better choice is to contact facilities you are interested in directly and see how they respond to your questions.  If they won’t talk to you when you call or all you get is a recorded menu with a litany of prompts to “enter this or that” number, you would be well advised to move on to the next clinic or firm on your list.

The next thing to consider is the types of stem cells they are using. Some facilities are legally restricted to using a single source of stem cells such as bone marrow, which means they treat everything on their “diseases treated” list with these.  In addition, the older you are the less robust your bone marrow stem cells are so if the treating facility just extracts your bone marrow and gives this back to you either immediately or during the ensuing 1 to 3 days, the chances of your getting a good result is fairly slim.  In older people, nonfunctioning senescent bone marrow stem cells should first be “flushed out” of the marrow via daily injections of Neupogen® which stimulates the remaining healthier stem cells to divide and multiple very rapidly. Then, 14 days after the last injection bone marrow is harvested and given since by then there will be ten times more fresh, vital stem cells present than were present before the Neupogen® “purge” was done. This process, which was pioneered by Dr. Steenblock, makes for a much more successful bone marrow stem cell treatment.

Other clinics use fat stem cells where the patient’s cells are prepared according to the directions provided by some outside company that specializes in making and/or marketing “fat stem cell kits” for use by doctors. In this situation the physician typically has no way to count the number of the fat stem cells present or assess how viable they are. According to Dr. Steenblock, procedures done using these kits produce such poor clinical results as to guarantee patient dissatisfaction and a resulting backlash against the doctors who used them. Given this, readers considering having a stem cell treatment should make sure to ask if the clinic or doctor has a stem cell lab and, if so, if it is equipped with a flow cytometer (A sophisticated cell counter.)  A good stem cell center will have these since without them neither the treating doctors nor you will know how many genuine stem cells you are getting. Also, only suitably qualified lab personnel can determine whether your stem cells are healthy and robust.

Naturally, anyone considering having a stem cell treatment wants to know if it is likely to work. Unfortunately most foreign clinics and hospitals build a case for doing their particular treatment on patient testimonials AKA case histories since they are not in a financial position to do bona fide clinical research studies. But case histories don’t tell the whole story since these clinics seldom discuss or disclose their failures. Some do not appear to even keep a tally of them and give lame excuses such as, “This sort of thing is what scientists do in big labs, not us”.

This iffy state-of-affairs leaves prospective patients in a tenuous position.  If you happen to have a medical condition or disease that is progressive and especially terminal, or for which the window of opportunity for responding to a stem cell treatment is narrow, these testimonials may be all you have to go on. There are, however, at least a few guidelines that will help you sort the “wheat from the chaff.” Among these:

  • Eschew stem cell facilities that make no real effort to insure that their patients are free of asymptomatic infections, especially chronic ones. For example, Dr. Steenblock has found that many people with age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) have undiagnosed and unnoticed chronic sinusitis. Infections in the sinuses and elsewhere produce chemical signals that attract stem cells and as such could result in infused or injected stem cells winding up engrafted in infected tissue as opposed to the target organ or tissue. In addition, infections churn out a host of compounds that are inimical to proliferating cells and that interfere with the stem cells ability to attach to damaged tissues.
  • Steer clear of stem cell clinics that treat most if not all diseases with a single type of stem cell.  Doctors and scientists who work with stem cells know that a single stem cell such as one from fat tissue or umbilical cord blood is unlikely to produce improvements in every conceivable disease or medical condition. It is by far wiser to find a clinic that can use or has access to bone marrow, fat and umbilical cord blood for the treatment of patients. Dr. Steenblock has pioneered the clinical use all three and has found that he gets much better results from a combination of them than from using a single type alone (Note: The fat and whole bone marrow treatments are done in his Mission Viejo, California clinic while cord blood derived stem cells are given at a clinic he consults for just across the US-Mexico border in Tijuana.)
  • Avoid stem cell clinics that use the wrong methods to infuse or inject stem cells. One example is a foreign stem cell clinic that routinely treats people with arthritis using stem cells given by lumbar puncture, which is to say injection into the spinal canal. Doctors in the know such as Dr. Steenblock characterize the use of inappropriate treatment methods as not only “unnecessary” but “reckless.” The truth is arthritis is best treated by giving specific stem cells such as mesenchymals by direct injection in and around diseased joints. In addition to these direct injections, many experienced stem cell doctors also give stem cells intravenously (IV drip) in addition to the joint injections. Platelet rich plasma is another good question to ask about. If the clinic you are considering going to is not using these, pass it up! These should be used routinely since they add little to the cost of a treatment but add a great deal in terms of clinical benefits since they contain more than seven stem cell growth promoting substances.

If you are seriously considering having a stem cell treatment please keep all the aforementioned points-in-mind as your examine the claims and offerings of stem cell providers. These articles of mine should prove helpful in this regard:

If you are uncertain as to whether stem cell therapy will help your condition and, if so, which particular stem cell or mix of cells is likely to give you optimal clinical results, there is a simple straightforward way to find out: Dr. David Steenblock is offering consultations that focus on answering (stem cell-related) questions. All you need do to set up your consultation is to call toll free 1-800-300-1063.

Share
WordPress SEO